<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nicole Talks Fashion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.haironthebrain.com/2009/07/nicole-talks-fashion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.haironthebrain.com/2009/07/nicole-talks-fashion/</link>
	<description>a blog full of hairbrained ideas</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 21:18:52 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kat</title>
		<link>http://www.haironthebrain.com/2009/07/nicole-talks-fashion/comment-page-1/#comment-1006</link>
		<dc:creator>Kat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 11:08:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.haironthebrain.com/?p=2445#comment-1006</guid>
		<description>not commenting on her as a person (how would i know?) but as far as her look is concerned, girl needs to evolve!

she went from style-lacking sidekick to eclipsing paris as a media and fashion darling during the peak of her time in the limelight. and it would seem (and i respect) that she doesn&#039;t have the same unquenchible thirst for fame and media attention as her former bff, but she&#039;s still rocking the &quot;hollywood hair&quot; from that era, and it feels a little frozen-in-time.  it&#039;s a good look for her, but also a bit more homogonized than seems right for the spunky spitfire she used to be.

i&#039;d love to flash forward 20 years.  are 45 year old former starlets still going to be locked into that hair?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>not commenting on her as a person (how would i know?) but as far as her look is concerned, girl needs to evolve!</p>
<p>she went from style-lacking sidekick to eclipsing paris as a media and fashion darling during the peak of her time in the limelight. and it would seem (and i respect) that she doesn&#8217;t have the same unquenchible thirst for fame and media attention as her former bff, but she&#8217;s still rocking the &#8220;hollywood hair&#8221; from that era, and it feels a little frozen-in-time.  it&#8217;s a good look for her, but also a bit more homogonized than seems right for the spunky spitfire she used to be.</p>
<p>i&#8217;d love to flash forward 20 years.  are 45 year old former starlets still going to be locked into that hair?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
